Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 CALAPP2D 656 - Barone v. Jones

Barone v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 1975
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 1975

17 state decisions

1001947195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNair v. Berger · Scarborough v. Urgo · 85 Cal. App. 535 - Smith v. Hollander · 110 Cal. App. 470 - Hayes v. Emerson · 129 Cal. App. 670 - Olson v. Meacham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the province of the trial judge to determine whether' a proffered photograph of the scene of an accident involved in the litigation fairly depicts the location and surrounding objects which are pertinent to the issues involved in the case. In the absence of an apparent abuse of discretion, or an affirmative showing of prejudice, the order admitting or rejecting a photograph will not be disturbed on appeal. (Olson v. Meacham, 129 Cal.App. 670, 673 [ 19 P.2d 527 ] ; Hayes v. Emerson, 110 Cal.App. 470 [ 294 P. 765 ]; 32 C.J.S. p. 625, § 716; 10 Cal.Jur. p. 896, § 169.)””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘One who parks his automobile upon the public traveled part of a highway is prima facie a violator of the law, and it is incumbent upon him to show affirmatively that it was necessary for him to so park it at that time and place. It is not the duty of a party injured in a collision under such circumstances to show that such parking was not necessary, but for the other party to bring himself within the exception provided by the statute.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.