Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 Cal. App. 4th 690 - Carlton v. Quint

77 Cal. App. 4th 690 - Carlton v. Quint’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably 137 Cal. App. 4th 645 - Boyle v. CertainTeed Corp. (2006), Towne v. Hubbard (2000)

31 state decisions

180200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 6 Cal. 3d 195 - Budd v. Nixen · 31 Cal. App. 4th 573 - Union Bank v. Superior Court · 36 Cal. App. 4th 657 - Thompson v. Halvonik · 45 Cal. App. 3d 925 - Tate v. Superior Court · 134 Cal. App. 2d 606 - De Luca v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is unwilling to take the chance that a continuance will be granted, he or she should file the best opposition possible under the circumstances. The opposition should include counsel's position on the defective-service/inadequate-notice issue, as well as the merits. The opposition should contain a complete discussion of counsel's position as to why a more complete opposition was not able to be filed (e.g., because the defective notice of motion did not give counsel adequate time to prepare a response). Counsel should then appear at the hearing, object to the hearing taking place because the service was defective and/or inadequate notice of the hearing was received; again explain to the court the prejudice that has been suffered by reason of the defective service and/or inadequate notice; and request a continuance of the hearing so that a proper response to the motion may be filed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an attorney who claims his client was not properly served with motion papers and/or that inadequate notice of the hearing was received”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.