Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 F.2d 525 - Riney v. Thomas

Riney v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

77 F.2d 525 · 1935

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2001
most recently cited

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The mere fact that Thomas may have so framed certain of the claims of his patent to include an inherent quality of Riney's invention which, perhaps, was not specifically mentioned by Riney in his disclosure, does not, in our opinion, entitle Thomas to the benefit of an invention which was, in fact, first conceived by Riney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “would be at once apparent to any one skilled in the art”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.