The Pueblos’s Empirical Analysis
77 F.2d 618 · 1935
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1581 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1584 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 482 · 27 U.S.C. § 1
Relies on United States v. Chambers · Maul v. United States · Yeaton v. The United States · United States v. Evans · United States v. The Ruth Mildred
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cod or fish of any other description whatever.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.