Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 F.2d 780 - Queen v. United States

Queen v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

77 F.2d 780 · 1935

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1995 · most notably Scher v. United States (1938), Williams v. United States (1943)

19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1401935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 266 · 26 U.S.C. § 267 · 26 U.S.C. § 268 · 26 U.S.C. § 269

Relies on United States v. Cook · United States v. Great Northern Railway Co. · Dukes v. United States · Hester v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(f) Distilled spirits not intended for sale or for use in the manufacture or production of any article intended for sale; . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.