Tang v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
77 F.3d 1194 · 1996
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Shaar v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1998), Paul Bowen v. Robert a Hood Fci (2000)
30 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co. · Sullivan v. Stroop · Warren III v. City of Carlsbad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In interpreting a statute, we must examine its language. If `the statue is clear and unambiguous, that is the end of the matter.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“agency's interpretation of a statute that it is entrusted to administer is entitled to considerable weight unless it is `arbitrary, capricious, or mani festly contrary to the statute.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the ques tion for the court is whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.