Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 F.3d 145 - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center’s Empirical Analysis

77 F.3d 145 · 1996

Citation profile

113
cited by 113 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

53 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Waterhouse v. District of Columbia (2002), Johnson v. City of Fort Wayne (1996)

53 federal appellate · 5 district ·

680199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court may advance to an ultimate issue in a summary judgment analysis and consider the discrimination question notwithstanding a dispute over a fact necessary for a prima facie case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “could have refused to hire [the employee] in the first place”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To expedite the process it may be preferable to get past the prima facie case and examine the pertinent issue of whether there was discrimination in a job action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.