Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 F.3d 468

Docket No. 95-7616.

Carter v. Angelone

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Relies on In Re: Reginald L. Frazier

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-765-R)

Ronald Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Leonard Taylor, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Angelone, No. CA-94-765-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/77/f3d/468 · .json · Public domain