Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 F.3d 469

Docket No. 95-7628.

Key v. Clarke

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Montgomery v. T Medlock Montgomery X E

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-1836-3-18BC)

Alonzo Key, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Holly, Gary Hudson Smith, III, BRAITHWAITE, MCCANTS & SMITH, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Key v. Clarke, No. CA-94-1836-3-18BC (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/77/f3d/469 · .json · Public domain