Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 F.3d 470

Docket No. 95-2807.

Nicholson v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided Feb. 21, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-21

Relies on Republican Party of North Carolina v. Hunt

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-95-1044-WMN)

Winfred F. Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Edward J. Snyder, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action against four Internal Revenue Service employees in which he alleged due process violations by their actions in levying on his wages. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nicholson v. Johnson, No. CA-95-1044-WMN (D.Md. Sept. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/77/f3d/470 · .json · Public domain