Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 F.3d 470

Docket No. 95-7541.

Queen v. Brennan

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 6, 1996 Decided Feb. 16, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-16

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Republican Party of North Carolina v. Hunt

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Nicholas J. Queen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn L. Grill, SMITH, SOMERVILLE & CASE, Baltimore, Maryland; Jefferson McClure Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Queen v. Brennan, No. CA-95-859-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/77/f3d/470 · .json · Public domain