Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 F.3d 472

Docket No. 95-7706.

United States v. Mark

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States of America v. McFadden

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Glen Mark, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mark, Nos. CR-89-263-G; CA-95-112-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/77/f3d/472 · .json · Public domain