Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 F.3d 486

Docket No. 95-3127.

United States v. Adan Oscar Barberena-Jimenez, Jr.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Filed Feb. 23, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-07

Relies on Anders v. California · Penson v. Ohio · United States v. Johnson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-07

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Lavandris Johnson appeals from the 1,013-month sentence imposed by the district court1 following resentencing pursuant to this court's remand order in United States v. Johnson, 56 F.3d 947, 957 n. 5, 959 (8th Cir.1995). Johnson's original trial counsel, appointed on appeal, has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw. Although granted leave, Johnson has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

¶2

The law-of-the-case doctrine controls the claims Johnson raised in his original direct appeal, see United States v. Bartsh, 69 F.3d 864, 866-67 (8th Cir.1995), and Johnson has waived the right to raise any new issues in this appeal, see United States v. Kress, 58 F.3d 370, 373-74 (8th Cir.1995). After conducting a review in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues. We grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

¶3

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

1

The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri

/77/f3d/486 · .json · Public domain