Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 F.3d 795 - Cantu v. Rocha

Cantu v. Rocha’s Empirical Analysis

77 F.3d 795 · 1996

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
2
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Kinney v. Weaver (2004), Gerald Burge v. St Tammany Parish of et al. (1999)

57 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

6201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Malley v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “could support a finding that particular conduct occurred,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are based on an issue of law when they concern only application of established legal principles, such as whether an official's conduct was objectively reasonable in light of clearly established law, to a given . . . set of facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[o]rders that resolve a fact-related dispute of 'evidence sufficiency,' i.e. which facts a party may, or may not, be able to prove at trial ... are not immediately appealable and must await final judgment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.