Brooks v. George County’s Empirical Analysis
77 F.3d 834 · 1996
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Parratt v. Taylor · Imbler v. Pachtman · Hudson v. Palmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“with the pretrial detainees at its regular meetings. Our conclusion that these statutes create a cognizable property right in wages is buttressed by the fact that the state has provided a mechanism whereby claims against the county can be presented directly to the board of supervisors or in state court. 6 Because Mississippi law creates a cognizable property right in wages for a pretrial detainee's work on public property, Brooks cannot be deprived of that right without due process of law. See Piatt v. MacDougall, 773 F.2d 1032 , 1036 (9th Cir.1985) (en banc) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the board shall reject any such claim in whole or in part, or refuse when requested at a proper time, to pass thereon, the claimant may appeal to the Circuit Court, or may bring suit against the county on any such claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Wilson v. Civil Town of Clayton, Ind., 839 F.2d 375 , 380 (7th Cir.1988). As this Court noted, where employees are acting in accord with customary procedures, the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.