Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 FAPPX 133 - Kozlowski v. Hampton School Board

Kozlowski v. Hampton School Board’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 630 (§ 11 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a witness is properly sequestered, that witness loses his ability to re-characterize his testimony in light of damaging contradictory testimony by other witnesses or to explain away inconsistencies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.