Hunter v. Lee

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2003

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-10-07

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2004

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Larry J. Hunter appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his complaint in which he alleged employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hunter v. Lee, No. CA-03-282-H-3 (E.D.N.C. July 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.