Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 F. App'x 661

Simret v. Ashcroft

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 10, 2003

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-10-10

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Huaman-Cornelio v. Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided 2003-10-10

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Yeterfwork Tesfa Simret, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration judge’s ruling and denying relief on her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that Simret failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution as necessary to qualify for relief from deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(D) (2000); INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); Huaman-Cornelio v. Board of Immigration Appeals, 979 F.2d 995, 999 (4th Cir. 1992).

¶2 Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3 PETITION DENIED.

/77/fappx/661 · .json · Public domain