Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 FSUPP2D 171 - Demont & Associates v. Berry

Demont & Associates v. Berry’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2016
most recently cited

4 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404

Relies on Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. · Norwood v. Kirkpatrick · Nowak v. Tak How Investments, Ltd. · Cianbro Corp. v. Curran-Lavoie, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1)Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction be, and it is hereby, GRANTED as to Defendants Tom Allison, Terry Le-Clere, and Montylee Watt, and the Complaint is hereby DISMISSED as to those Defendants without prejudice, and is DENIED as to Defendants Applied Microwave Technologies, Inc. and Timothy Scheurs; (2) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count V for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted be, and it is hereby, DENIED. (3) Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa be, and it is hereby, DENIED.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.