Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 FSUPP2D 284 - Schiavone v. Pearce

Schiavone v. Pearce’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
June 2015
most recently cited

4 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (§ 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · United States v. Bestfoods

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* first, “when the parent operates the facility in the stead of its subsidiary or alongside the subsidiary in some sort of a joint venture”; * second, when a dual officer or director departs so far from the norms of parental influence; and * third, when “an agent of the parent with no hat to wear but the parent’s hat” manages or directs activities at the facility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.