Jackson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1582 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United States v. Gaubert · United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense · United States v. Montoya De Hernandez · McMahon v. United States · Gray III v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court holds that a FTCA plaintiff must first overcome the discretionary function `hurdle' before the Court will consider intentional tort claims under S 2680(h).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.