Bascom Research, LLC v. Linkedin, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 101 · 35 U.S.C. § 271
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Tw Electrical Service Inc Nn v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Association · Diamond v. Diehr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an alleged infringer asserting an invalidity defense pursuant to § 101 bears the burden of proving invalidity by clear and convincing evidence”); Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 56 F.Supp.3d 1167, 1170 (C.D.Cal.2014) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.