Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 Ill. App. 464

Robeson v. Hutton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 31, 1898

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1898-08-31

<p>1. Freehold—When Involved.—In an action of trespass against the commissioners of highways who justify under the plea that the land was a public highway, from which the plaintiff had been duly notified to remove his fence and failed to do so, and that the defendants, as commissioners of highways, entered upon it and removed the fence for the purpose of opening the highway, etc., a freehold is involved and this court has no jurisdiction.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1901

1 state decisions

Relies on Chaplin v. Commissioners of Highways · Town of Brushy Mound v. McClintock · Taylor v. Pierce

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction · Decided 1898-08-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1This is an action of trespass, by appellant against appellees, for breaking and entering appellant’s close, etc. .

¶2Appellees justify, under the plea, that the land was a public highway, from which appellant had been duly notified to remove his fence and had failed to do so; and that appellees, as commissioners of highways, had peaceably entered upon it and removed the fence for the purpose of opening the highway, as they were legally bound to do, etc.

¶3This case involves a freehold, and this court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine it. The appeal should have been to the Supreme Court. Mary Taylor v. A. L. Pierce et al., 174 Ill. 9; James Chaplin v. Commissioners of Highways, 126 Ill. 264; Town of Brushy Mound v. McClintock, 146 Ill. 643; Village of Crete v. Fidelia L. Hewes et al., 168 Ill. 330.

¶4The appeal is dismissed. Leave to appellant to withdraw records and files.

/77/illapp/464 · .json · Public domain