Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 KAN 665 - Walterscheid v. Bowdish

Walterscheid v. Bowdish’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1934
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Memphis v. United States · Weaver v. . Haviland · Stocker v. Davidson · Watkins v. Glenn · Henley v. Stevenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The controversy then depends upon whether the liability of the plaintiffs in error was an obligation imposed by the statute and expiring with the statute, or whether it. was founded in contract and was beyond the power of the legislature to affect. The question was answered in Stocker v. Davidson, 74 Kan. 214 , 86 Pac. 136 [ 118 Am. St. Rep. 315 ], a portion of the syllabus of which reads: “ ‘in this state the statutory liability of a stockholder to pay upon the debts of the corporation an amount in addition to his subscript ion equal to the liar value of his stock becomes an asset of the corporation in the event of its insolvency. The liability is one arising upon contract. The right of action to enforce it is one arising upon contract.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.