Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 Kan. 764

Hudson v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1908

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1908-01-11

<p>1. Elections — Incumbent Ineligible — Rights of Minority Candidate. It was said the fact that an incumbent of an office to which he had been elected was ineligible conferred no claim to the office on a minority candidate.</p> <p>2. Quo Warranto — Parties. Such minority candidate, having- . no title to the office, could not maintain an action in quo warranto to challenge the incumbent’s right to hold the office.</p>

Relies on Privett v. Bickford · Wood v. Bartling

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed · Decided 1908-01-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1974

5 state decisions

3019081910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1This is an original action in quo warranto, brought by A. J. Hudson, who was a candidate for councilman of the city of Chanute, against C. E. Conklin, another candidate for the same office, who received a majority of the votes cast and is in possession of the office. The ground of contest is that Conklin was ineligible . to accept or hold the office because he was not an owner of real estate within the city, but the ineligibility of' Conklin, if it exists, does not give a minority candidate any claim to the office. (Wood v. Bartling, Mayor, 16 Kan. 109; Privett v. Bickford, 26 Kan. 52, 40 Am. Rep. 801.) Since it is conceded that Hudson has no title to the office, he has no interest, personal or peculiar to himself, which warrants him in challenging the right of the incumbent to hold the office. Having no interest which differs from other members of the general public, he must leave the maintenance of the action, if there be grounds for one, to some one authorized to appear for and represent the general public.

¶2The proceeding is therefore dismissed.

/77/kan/764 · .json · Public domain