Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 Md. App. 268 - Herget v. Herget

77 Md. App. 268 - Herget v. Herget’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2017

14 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ray v. Eurice · Smith v. Smith · Gross v. Gross · Bernstein v. Kapneck · Frey v. Frey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the right to a monetary award ... is not an interest in the estate or property of one's spouse,' and therefore is not covered by the language of the agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Since the concept of the monetary award was not introduced in this State until 1978 ... it is understandable that the parties to the antenuptial agreement in the case sub judice did not contemplate a monetary award in 1973. This lack of contemplation of such a concept, however, is the very reason why [Ms. Herget] did not surrender her right to seek a monetary award which did not exist at the time she entered the antenuptial agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`a court, in construing an agreement, must first determine from the language of the agreement itself, what a reasonable person in the position of the parties would have meant at the time it was effectuated.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.