Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 Minn. 404

McCune v. Eaton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 11, 1899

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1899-10-11

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Elliott, J., denying a motion to modify the form of judgment entered.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed · Decided 1899-10-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1942

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

20189919001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CANTY, J.

¶1This action was tried by the court and a jury. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, he rested his case, and thereupon, on motion of defendants, the action was, by order of the court, dismissed. The clerk entered judgment adjudging that the action “is hereby dismissed upon the merits.” Plaintiff moved to correct the judgment by striking out the words “upon the merits,” and appeals from an order denying the motion.

¶2In our opinion, the order appealed from should be reversed. The judgment entered is a bar to the bringing of another action for the cause of action stated in the complaint. This is conceded by both parties, and respondents insist that on the record they are entitled to such a judgment. Gr. S. 1894, § 5408, provides:

*405“The action may be dismissed, without a final determination of its merits, in the following cases: …
Third. By the court, where, upon the trial, and before the final submission of the case, the plaintiff abandons it, or fails to substantiate or establish his claim, or cause of action, or right to recover.”

¶3Section 5409 provides:

“In every case, other than those mentioned in the last section, the judgment shall be rendered on the merits.”

¶4The judgment which should have been entered in this action is that prescribed by the former section, not that prescribed by the latter.

¶5The order should be reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to the court below to correct the judgment in accordance with this opinion. So ordered.

/77/minn/404 · .json · Public domain