¶1While the trial court, consistent with the authority of Levine v. Ehrenberg (N. Y. L. J., June 11,1973, p. 18, col. 2 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]) was justified, in the circumstances of this case, in finding for tenants on the counterclaims, nevertheless, there was a lack of adequate proof of the reduced value of the apartments as a result of the landlord’s failure to supply heat (Borchardt v. Parker, 108 N. Y. S. 585 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]; see, also, 1900-51st St. Corp. v. Dennis, 182 Misc. 127 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Jackson v. Paterno, 58 Misc. 201 [App. Term, 1st Dept.], affd. 128 App. Div. 474; Levine v. Ehrenberg, supra).
77 Misc. 2d 774
Steinberg v. Carreras
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 12, 1974
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1974-06-12
Relies on Jackson v. Paterno · Borchardt v. Parker · 1900-51st Street Corp. v. Dennis
Decided 1974-06-12