Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 N.C. 526

State v. Hampton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1877

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1877-06-15

INDICTMENT for a Misdemeanor, triéd at Spring Term, 1877, of Buncombe Superior Court, before Funches, J. The defendant was indicted for selling liquor in violation of Laws 1874-’75, eh. 126 : Sec. 1. “That it shall be unlawful for any person or persons to sell or in any manner give away any intoxicating liquors, or either directly or indirectly receive any compensation for the same, within three miles of the located line of the Asheville and Spartanburg Railroad during the…

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1951

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1877-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Eaibuloth, J.

¶1This case turns on the Act of 1874-’75, ch. 126, making it unlawful for any person to sell any intoxicating liquors within three miles of the located line of the Asheville and Spartanburg Railroad, during the construction of the said road.”

¶2The defendant sold liquor within three miles of the “ located line,” but not within three miles of any part of it undergoing construction, which seems to be the proper interpretation ; especially as this view remedies the evil probably aimed at.

¶3If the Legislature intended to give exclusive jurisdiction of this offence to a Justice of the Peace, they failed to do so, by not complying with' Art. IV. § 33 (now § 27) of the Constitution.

¶4There is error. Let this be certified to the Superior Court of Buncombe County to the end that the defendant may be discharged.

¶5Pee, Cueiaij. Judgment reversed.

/77/nc/526 · .json · Public domain