Lee v. Gruschus’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 1984
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grisham v. Nelms · Chambers v. Bessent · Patten v. Santa Fe Nat. Life Ins. Co. · Peck v. Wright · Torris v. Dysart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a suit * * * against the * * * administrators * * * of a deceased person, a claimant, * * * shall not obtain a judgment or decision on his own evidence, in respect of any matter occurring before the death of the deceased person, unless sucK evidence is supported by some other material evidence tending to corroborate the claimant * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wallace v. Wanek““ * * * The findings made were supported by substantial evidence; hence, the court’s refusal to make findings and conclusions to the contrary was not error. Grisham v. Nelms, 71 N.M. 37 , 376 P.2d 1 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McBride v. Allison““ * * * We have so many times stated that we will not weigh the evidence on review that citation of authorities is deemed unnecessary.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McBride v. Allison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.