Varney v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Lujan v. Gonzales (1972), Stang v. Hertz Corporation (1970)
2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. Addie Kelly · Hogsett v. Hanna · Ortega v. Koury · Mares v. New Mexico Public Service Co. · Bolt v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If you find for the Plaintiff on the issue of liability, you must decide the amount of damages which would compensate for the monetary worth of the life of decedent had it continued. In fixing damages, you should consider: (1) The monetary loss, or lack of it, to the family, but damages may be recovered without proof of such monetary loss; (2) The age, earning capacity, health, habits and probable duration of life of the decedent; (3) The monetary value of the personal services of the decedent to the family; (4) The aggravating or mitigating circumstances attending the conduct which results in death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * recovery belongs to the relative for whose benefit the suit is brought, and the right of recovery extends to those distributees named in the statute, or to those entitled under the laws of descent and distribution, in the same manner and to the same extent as is given to the wife and children of the decedent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Varney v. Taylor““* * * There are, no doubt, other amounts which should reasonably be deducted from gross earnings to arrive at that figure which would properly amount to the equivalent of the loss of reasonably expected benefits that would have resulted from the continued life of the decedent.” [Emphasis added]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. Wylie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.