Blueher Lumber Company v. Springer’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2002
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Montano v. Saavedra · Frederick v. Younger Van Lines · Allsop Lumber Co. v. Continental Casualty Co. · Blancett v. Homestake-Sapin Partners · Huber v. American President Lines, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The trial court was not required to view plaintiff’s .testimony, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom in its most favorable aspect for plaintiff. Rather, the court weighs the testimony and applies its judgment thereto. Frederick v. Younger Van Lines, 74 N.M. 320 , 393 P.2d 438 ; Blancett v. Homestake-Sapin Partners, 73 N.M. 47 , 385 P.2d 568 . ‘A prima facie case’ does not preclude this action by the trial court. Huber v. American President Lines, 240 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1957).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.