Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 N.Y.2d 885

People v. Dien

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1991

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1991-03-21

Decided 1991-03-21

¶1 OPINION OF THE COURT

¶2 Memorandum.

¶3 The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that a specific comment made by the prosecutor during summation violated *886 his rights to a fair trial by an impartial jury and to equal protection under the law. At the time of the prosecutor’s statement, however, defendant made only a general objection, thus failing to preserve his argument for this Court’s review (see, People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941, 942; People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 776).

¶4 Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

¶5 Order affirmed in a memorandum.

/77/ny2d/885 · .json · Public domain