Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 NY2D 95 - People v. Carter

People v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o one disputes that defendants should have been prosecuted for these felonies by an Assistant District Attorney who was duly admitted to practice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “neither the Constitution nor any statute requires that a District Attorney or an Assistant District Attorney be an admitted lawyer”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.