Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 Ohio App. 20 - Fowler v. Young

77 Ohio App. 20 - Fowler v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2009

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

401945195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A trial de novo connotes an examination of testimony and an independent finding made as fully as though the action was originally instituted in that court, in which event it would be immaterial what errors were committed in the hearing before the board. Also it would be immaterial what the findings of the board were.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.