77 Ohio App. 3d 701 - State v. Ensman’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2019
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sellards · 7 Ohio App. 3d 364 - State v. Gingell · Michael O. Watson v. A. R. Jago, Superintendent · 35 Ohio App. 3d 135 - State v. Dotson · 145 Ohio St. 552 - State v. Derighter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“charging a defendant in an indictment as if he were a principal will sustain proof that he acted as an aider and abettor of the principal”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Accordingly, a defendant who is 'indicted for aggravated murder in terms of the principal offense * * * [is] on notice that evidence could be presented that he was either a principal offender or an aider and abetter.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ruble“[a] charge of complicity may be stated in terms of [that] section, or in terms of the principal offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ruble
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.