Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 OR 320 - Pullen v. Eugene

Pullen v. Eugene’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
March 1951
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 1951

21 state decisions

7019151920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moynihan v. Todd · Robinson v. . Chamberlain · De Vall v. De Vall · Browning v. City of Springfield · Batdorff v. Oregon City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To recover for a loss occasioned by official dereliction of duty, not involving more than $100, an action may be maintained against the defendant herein. If, however, the amount of injury caused by the negligence of the defendant or its agents exceeds that sum, an action may be maintained against the officers of the municipality whose duty it was to cause the street to be repaired, and to see that the highway was kept in suitable condition for public travel. Since such a remedy is availing, the section of the charter referred to does not violate the clause of the fundamental law of the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.