¶1*440Denied September 21, 1915.
¶2Petition tor Rehearing.
¶4Department 1. Mr. Justice McBride delivered the opinion of the court.
¶5
“The owner or owners of two thirds of the land.next adjacent thereto may make and file with the council a written remonstrance against the proposed improvement, and thereupon the same shall not be proceeded with. ’ ’
¶6The administrator is not the owner of the property, and is only entitled to possession for the purposes of administration, the legal title passing directly to the heir. It follows, therefore, that the signature of the administrator upon a remonstrance is ineffective for any purpose. If.it happen that he is an heir to an interest in the property, his signature will be good as to his interest, but no further. With this explanation we adhere to our original opinion.
¶7Rehearing Denied.