State v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 113 Wash. 2d 83 - State v. Shove · 108 Wash. 2d 527 - State v. Bernhard · 94 Wash. App. 46 - State v. Hale · 91 Wash. App. 581 - State v. Clark · 92 Wash. App. 723 - State v. DeBello
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No person serving a sentence imposed pursuant to this chapter and committed to the custody of the department shall leave the confines of the correctional facility or be released prior to the expiration of the sentence except as follows.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When a trial court exceeds its sentencing authority under the [Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, chapter 9.94A RCW], it commits reversible error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“leaves no room for inherent authority to be exercised by the sentencing court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harkness
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.