Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 P.3d 751 - People v. Smith

People v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2020

16 state decisions

80200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Old Chief v. United States · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. · Wilson v. People · People v. Arguello · People v. Albo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] trial court may refuse to give a defendant's theory of the case instruction that misstates the law. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Here, even if we assume that admitting evidence of the nature of defendant's prior convictions was error under Old Chief v. United States , 519 U.S. 172 , 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997), we conclude the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, including his own testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A trial court's determination that a defendant waived the constitution al right to counsel will be upheld if the record affirmatively establishes that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived that right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.