77 Sickels
1 opinion
This was an action to recover a balance alleged to be due ■upon an account. The principal questions discussed were as to the right oi plaintiff’s husband to bind her by his own acts ostensibly a$ her agent, and as to whether certain transactions were authorized by her, as to which the verdict was held to be conclusive. A sentence in the charge was excepted to ; it was held there was no evidence warranting the submission of the question stated therein to the jury.
