Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 SO2D 169 - Morgan v. Hathaway

Morgan v. Hathaway’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1983

3 state decisions

101954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 44 So. 2d 151 - Succession of Valdez · Duncan v. Duncan · Morgan v. Hathaway · Hamilton v. Fusilier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defense is, we think, fully made out. The written instrument, in the nature of a counter letter, not denied by the plaintiff nor in any manner impugned by him, is an effectual bar against the plaintiff’s pretensions to ownership of the property.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.