State v. Wiltz’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 847 So. 2d 175 - Stephenson v. Stephenson · Gregorie v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · 348 So. 2d 225 - Mosley v. Mosley · McDaniel v. McDaniel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Voluntary unemployment or underemployment is a fact-driven consideration. The trial court has wide discretion in determining the credibility of witnesses, and its factual determinations will not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of manifest error. Whether a spouse is in good faith in ending or reducing his or her income is a factual determination which will not be disturbed absent manifest error. Romanowski [v. Romanow ski], [ 03-124 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/23/04) , 873 So.2d 656 ]. We cannot substitute our findings for the reasonable factual findings of the trial court. See Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 617 So.2d 880, 882-83 (La.1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.