77 So. 3d 477 - State v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
25 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Dorthey · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. · 922 So. 2d 517 - State v. Pigford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice to do any of the following shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than ten years, or may be fined not more than one hundred thousand dollars, or both: (1) To defraud a financial institution. (2) To obtain any of the monies, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by or under the custody or control of a financial institution by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, practices, transactions, representations, or promises.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“by the existence of a scheme which was 'reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehension,' and this intention is shown by examining the scheme itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.