Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 SW3D 285 - Peacock v. State

Peacock v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Olmstead v. United States · McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. · Connolly v. State · Rodriguez v. State · Stover v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Second Court of Appeals erred when it applied a de novo standard of review and rejected the trial court’s fact findings even though the findings were premised on matters deserving deference which were supported by the record. The Second Court of Appeals erred when it held that the trial court should have dismissed the State’s revocation petition for a lack of due diligence on the part of the State in executing the arrest warrants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a statewide criminal information database used by law enforcement agencies”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.