Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 SW3D 405 - Ashorn v. State

Ashorn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 23rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Verburgt v. Dorner · Olivo v. State · Janecka v. State · Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc. · Linwood v. NCNB Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Notice must be given in writing and filed with the trial court clerk. (2) Notice is sufficient if it shows the party’s desire to appeal from the judgment or other appealable order. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.