Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 S.W.3d 76

Belleville v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2002

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2002-06-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2003

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-06-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Michael Belleville (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits after an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, movant claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel by the failure of his counsel to litigate a motion to suppress statements prior to movant’s guilty plea.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/77/sw3d/76 · .json · Public domain