Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

77 Tex. 96

Cleveland v. Simpson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1890

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1890-04-29

<p>Execution Sale.—A purchaser at execution sale when the execution issues in the name of one only of a partnership, and under a judgment in favor of the firm, acquires no title.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1890-04-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1969

8 state decisions

2018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HENRY, Associate Judge.

¶1This was an action of trespass to try title brought by appellant. The defendant pleaded not guilty." The cause was tried by the court without a jury.

¶2The conclusions of fact filed by the court show that the plaintiff deraigned his title to the premises as follows: W. D. Cleveland and C.

¶3Lombardi,. composing the firm of W. D. Cleveland & Co., recovered in the District Court of Hill County a judgment for money against Dyer & Driggs and H. L. Dyer.

¶4Execution upon the judgment was issued in the name of W. D. Cleveland alone, and levied upon the property in controversy, pursuant to which it was sold by the sheriff and deeded to plaintiff. The execution was not authorized by the judgment, and the sale and deed made under it can not be sustained. Rev. Stats., art. 2281; Battle v. Guedry, 58 Texas, 111; Criswell v. Ragsdale, 18 Texas, 443.

¶5The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

¶6Reversed and remanded.

¶7Delivered April 29, 1890.

/77/tex/96 · .json · Public domain