Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 U.S. 273 - Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live

Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live’s Empirical Analysis

77 U.S. 273 · 1869

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 15 district · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), Hovey v. McDonald (1883)

27 federal appellate · 15 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 12 states

2001869187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M'Kim v. Voorhies · Hart v. Mayor of Albany

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““^Neither an injunction, nor a decree dissolving an injunction, passed in a circuit court, is reversed or nullified by an appeal or writ o£ error before the cause is heard in tins court.” Slaughter-house Cases, 10 Wall. 273 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Power to issue a supersedeas to a Judgment rendered in a subordinate court does not exist in this court where the writ of error is not sued out and served within 10 days (extended to (50 days by section 11, Act of June 1, 1872, c. 255, 17 Stat. 198 ) from the date of the judgment, except where the aggrieved party is obliged to sue out a second writ of error in consequence of the neglect of the clerk below to send up the record in season, or where the granting of such a writ is necessary to the exercise of the appellate jurisdiction of the court, as where the subordinate court improperly rejected the sureties to the bond because they were not residents of the district.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.