77 Wash. 2d 194 - State v. Creach’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2005 · most notably 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green (1980), Duckworth v. Eagan (1989)
8 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3501
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Mathis v. United States · Orozco v. Texas · United States v. Gibson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In general, Miranda requires that, prior to custodial interrogation of an accused, he must be warned: (1) that he has the right to remain silent; (2) that any statement he does make can and will be used as evidence against him in a court of law; (3) that he has the right to consult with counsel before answering any questions; (4) that he has the right to have his counsel present during the interrogation; (5) and that if he cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for him without cost to him, prior to questioning, if he so desires. The ultimate question for decision is always: Was the confession or statement voluntarily given? State v. Darst, 65 Wn.2d 808, 815 , 399 P.2d 618 (1965). Miranda , however, indicates that an affirmative answer cannot be supported unless the five warnings listed are given to the accused prior to interrogation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[b]y custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Q. Do you understand that you have the constitutional right to have the advice of an attorney before making this statement? Q. Do you understand that if you do not have the funds to hire an attorney the court will appoint an attorney for you free of charge to you?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.